LMIC radio

Gundaris Pone. Portraits

Recorded

2024

Release date

21.06.2024

Compositions

Description

LMIC 161

There are composers of local significance, and there are composers with global breadth – Gundaris Pone is one of the latter. He is undoubtedly among the most interesting and important figures in Latvian music, a man who must not remain only in history. When we connect Pone with the reality of the present day, we find that his work sounds fresh, topical and relevant. Although he spent most of his life in the United States and Venice, we nevertheless refer to “Latvian music” because Pone himself believed that Latvia was the true place for his scores.

Pone considered himself a European and once stated in an interview with Aija Vanka on Latvian Radio: “I realised that one of the ways for me, a non-American (although I have been an American citizen for many years), to move up in life was to compete with other composers. I’ve been awarded first prizes in international competitions since the late 1970s. In 1981, I won in Trieste with La Serenissima; the same work won the Louisville Orchestra New Music Competition in 1983 and also won the Whitney Prize. In 1982, Avanti! was named the best American orchestral work, and I received the Kennedy Center Friedheim Award. I’ve also won the George Enescu Prize, the International Hambach Prize Competition (with my composition Di gran maniera, which was beautifully performed in Riga by [the distinguished violinist] Valdis Zariņš) and two others.”

Latvian music up until the second half of the 20th century largely reflected a mood of national romanticism. In this context, Pone’s music seemed to many like the avantgarde of its time.

However, Pone explained to Vanka: “I’ve never considered myself an avantgardist. That’s a label others have put on me – whether friends or unfriends, I don’t know. My creative intention in music is very democratic and egalitarian. I think music should be written for the broadest masses of people, including those who haven’t been specially educated in music.”

One of the issues inevitably discussed and evaluated in relation to Pone is his worldview, which could casually be called Marxist. In an interview with Latvian composer Imants Zemzaris, Pone clearly called himself a socialist, a Marxist, a communist.

In this regard, musicologist Sofija Vēriņa commented adeptly in 1990 in Issue 5 of the magazine Māksla, recalling Pone’s first visit to Latvia in the summer of 1971: “The main issue was not the art of this visitor, but what political status he should be given. The emigrant (who at the age of eleven had fled into exile with his parents). The avantgardist (unacceptable to us). Yes, very progressive, so a humanist (but not a Marxist). A Trotskyist!, finally decided the Latvian Committee for Cultural Relations with Compatriots Abroad. However, the composer was received very kindly, with the authorities trying to adapt the universal humanist ideas in his work as best as possible to the official [Soviet] propaganda. Thus Gundaris Pone (like his friend and colleague [the eminent Italian composer Luigi] Nono) found himself in a paradoxical position: here, due to his high humanistic potential, he was considered ideologically ‘correct’ but technically misguided, whereas some compatriots 
abroad saw him as ideologically misguided but technically ‘correct’.”

Composer David J. Sosnowski, a student of Pone’s in the early 1970s, spoke warmly of his teacher of  composition, theory and counterpoint to the magazine Mūzikas Saule: “He left a long-lasting impression upon me. I was a difficult young man, more interested in breaking the shackles of tradition than understanding them. Yet he was patient with me. I always remember his kindness, and I remember being surprised even then with his gentle tolerance of my rebellious attitudes. Still, he persisted and instilled in me a lasting regard for the importance of able craftsmanship and ‘knowing what the rules are before you decide to break them’. His influence was foundational and remains deeply fundamental to my writing to this day. It’s interesting how the character and thought of a man like Pone reach across the years through those who learned from him. I believe he would have smiled at that, for he understood that ideas are like organisms, and the planting of the seeds 
by them creates new and unexpected conceptions for decades and centuries after the sower of the seeds has departed.”

Pone is said to have been a flamboyant man. There are rumours of extravagances – crocodile-skin belts and so on. At the same time, he was also somewhat reserved by nature. He did not intrude upon others with his biography. The French accent on the e in his surname is supposedly an example of misunderstood flamboyance. It seems more likely that this un-Latvian accent aigu was merely intended to indicate that the e – which in this position is usually silent in English – is nevertheless pronounced.

Orests Silabriedis

Review

The first studio recordings of three of Gundaris Pone's large-scale orchestral works reveal a mid-20th century composer of great imagination writing European music yet with his roots in Latvia

Latvian-American composer Gundaris Pone wrote music that transcended his country of birth. Born in Riga, his family emigrated to America in 1950, fleeing the advancing Soviet troops, and it was here that Pone trained and lived. Latvian music up until the second half of the 20th century largely reflected a mood of national romanticism, so Pone’s music seemed to many like the avantgarde of its time, yet Pone himself believed that Latvia was the true place for his scores. 

Of his style, Pone would say in an interview that though he was labelled an avantgardist, he had never considered himself so, that he thought "music should be written for the broadest masses of people, including those who haven’t been specially educated in music."

This album from the Latvian Music Information Centre's SKANI label features world premiere studio recordings of works for large orchestra La SerenissimaAmerican Portraits and Avanti! All written between 1971 and 1984. The performers are the Liepāja Symphony Orchestra, conductors Guntis Kuzma and Normunds Šnē.

We begin with La Serenissima, seven Venetian portraits for orchestra, a work that won competitions in Trieste in 1981 and in Louisville in 1983 as well as the Witney prize. Venice held a special place in the composer's heart and in later life he divided his time between the city and the USA. The work's material revolves around five notes, A – E flat – E – D – B, evidently spelling out LA S(es)-E-RE-nisSIma. The language is richly evocative and lush, even though the style is definitely modernism. But I kept getting hints of Britten's intelligent use of 20th century modernism too, here is a composer viewing European music through distinctly individualistic glasses. The work is in seven parts, each with an Italian title though for convenience I refer to the English translations.

Part 1, The dialectic of morning shadows: in the streets and squares, is distinctly evocative, full of distinctive timbres and textures, richly complex harmonies. Part 2, Lyrical Venice: the Arch of Paradise remains complex yet transparent, contrasting wildly with the vivid trumpets at the opening of Part 3, Severe Venice: the mouth of the lion, which merges violence with vibrant dance. Part 4, The dialectic of afternoon waters, is delicate yet busy and quasi-nocturnal whilst Part 5, A meeting with the messenger of death on the island of San Michele moves into real night music, or perhaps nightmare music. Part 6, Evening chatter on San Bartolomeo Square is all vivid scurrying yet with something eerie about it too, what are these people chattering about. Finally, Part 7, The dialectic of night fog: spectral Venice, which has an underlying rhythmic structure with more slithering music over, again I had thoughts about Britten and his fondness for passcaglia structure, but also get surprising fragments of popular songs.

This is large scale, complex music yet such is the evocative, almost descriptive nature of Pone's writing that despite the complexity the music has great appeal. Full of timbres and textures, Pone uses his orchestra with great idiosyncratic skill. Why don't we know this music more? The performers on the disc gave the work's Latvian premiere in May 2023, so it is not surprising if others have not picked it up, yet.

We don't know that much about the origins of Pone's American Portraits. Written in 1983-84, the composer stated in a letter that the work was to be performed by the Baltimore Symphony Orchestra in the 1985-86 season, but the first known performance is by the Louisville Symphony Orchestra in 1986. Evidently Pone stated that he had portrayed five Americans: an inventor, a famous film star, a powerful financier, a gangster and a military genius. All legendary – some in a good way, others in a bad way. No more details!

The work is in five movements, each vividly characterised and perhaps slightly harder edged and less evocative than La Serenissima but still Pone's writing is vivid and eclectic. He isn't frightened of hard modernist sounds, yet can continue with a quote from Five Foot Two, Eyes of Blue composed by Ray Henderson, which Pone notes should to be performed in a 1920s style. It is this sheer eclecticism and vivid imagination that appeals.

The final work on the disc Avanti! is the earliest, dating from 1975. Avanti! was commissioned for the 1975 Latvian Song Festival in Toronto, but the event’s organising committee rejected the composition. Judging by contemporary articles, the organisers of the 1983 Song Festival in Milwaukee were of the same mind – Avanti! was not performed for political reasons, and also the piece turned out to be too difficult to be played with the musical resources available. Pone has a clear dialectic and perhaps didactic aim in the piece, he uses a motif from the Latvian 1905 revolutionary song With Battle Cries on Our Lips to an effect that we might see as political. Perhaps this is a good moment to remember that Pone, at various times, called himself a socialist, a Marxist, a communist.

The highly informative booklet quotes musicologist Sofija Vēriņa recalling, in 1990, Pone's first visit to Latvia in 1971 (at the height of the Soviet period), "The main issue was not the art of this visitor, but what political status he should be given. The emigrant (who at the age of eleven had fled into exile with his parents). The avantgardist (unacceptable to us). Yes, very progressive, so a humanist (but not a Marxist). A Trotskyist!, finally decided the Latvian Committee for Cultural Relations with Compatriots Abroad. However, the composer was received very kindly, with the authorities trying to adapt the universal humanist ideas in his work as best as possible to the official [Soviet] propaganda. Thus Gundaris Pone (like his friend and colleague [the eminent Italian composer Luigi] Nono) found himself in a paradoxical position: here, due to his high humanistic potential, he was considered ideologically ‘correct’ but technically misguided, whereas some compatriots abroad saw him as ideologically misguided but technically ‘correct’." The mention in Nono is intriguing, as here is another composer who combined complexity with a lack of dogma and a sense of vivid imagination.

Other elements in Avanti include, disturbingly, a cuckoo, and a quotation of Bach’s mournful chorale O Traurigkeit, o Herzeleid, of which Pone said, "That is all I can do within my philosophy. Because after all, we do not know what the final answer will be; we can only stand before the question mark."

The Liepāja Symphony Orchestra, conductors Guntis Kuzma (for La Serenissima and American Portraits) and Normunds Šnē (for Avanti!) do Pone proud. This is a vividly realised recording which does full justice to the complexity and vivid imagination of this music. 

Robert Hugill,
www.planethugill.com, 22/07/2024

Test alt tekst