LMIC radio

Gundaris Pone. Portraits

Ieraksts

2024

Izdošanas datums

21.06.2024

Skaņdarbi

Apraksts

LMIC 161

Ir vietējas nozīmes komponisti, un ir tādi, kas ar pasaules elpu, — Gundaris Pone pieder pie otrējiem. Neapšaubāmi viena no interesantākajām un nozīmīgākajām personībām Latvijas mūzikā — vīrs, kurš nedrīkst  palikt tikai vēsturē. Kad savienojam Poni ar mūslaiku realitāti, pārliecināmies, ka skan svaigi, aktuāli un būtiski. 

Kaut gan mūža lielākā daļa Ponem pagāja ASV un Venēcijā, lietojam jēdzienu ‘Latvijas mūzika’, jo pats Pone  uzskatīja, ka viņa partitūrām īstā vieta ir Latvija. 

Gundaris Pone uzskatīja sevi par eiropieti un intervijā Latvijas Radio apskatniecei Aijai Vankai savulaik teica:  “Apzinājos, ka viens no veidiem, kā man, neamerikānim (kaut gan jau daudzus gadus esmu Amerikas pilsonis), tikt dzīvē uz augšu, ir sacensties ar citiem komponistiem. Kopš 70. gadu beigām esmu ieguvis pirmās prēmijas starptautiskās sacensībās. 1981. gadā uzvarēju Triestā ar darbu La Serenissima, 1983. gadā tas pats darbs  uzvarēja starptautiskajās Luivilas (Louisville) orķestra sacensībās un ieguva Vitnija (Whitney) prēmiju. 1982. gadā Avanti tika atzīts par labāko amerikāņu orķestra darbu, saņēmu Kenedija centra Frīdheima prēmiju. Esmu ieguvis arī Džordžes Enesku prēmiju, Hambahas pilsētas prēmiju (tur uzvarēja kompozīcija Di gran maniera, ko Rīgā brīnišķīgi atskaņoja [izcilais vijolnieks] Valdis Zariņš) un vēl divas.”

Latviešu mūzikas caurmēra noskaņojums līdz 20. gadsimta otrajai pusei ir nacionālais romantisms. Šajā kontekstā Gundaŗa Pones daiļrade daudziem liekas sava laika avangards. 

Taču Pone Aijai Vankai saka: “Pats sevi par avangardistu nekad neesmu uzskatījis. To man citi piekāruši klāt — vai nu draugi, vai nedraugi, nezinu. Mans radošais nolūks mūzikā ir ļoti demokrātisks. Manuprāt, mūzika ir jāraksta visplašākām tautas masām, arī cilvēkiem bez speciālas izglītības.”

Viens no apspriežamiem un izvērtējamiem jautājumiem saistībā ar Gundara Pones personību ir viņa pasaules uzskats, ko vieglu balsi mēdzam saukt par marksistisku. Intervijā Imantam Zemzarim Pone skaidri saka — esot sociālists, marksists, komunists. 

Te lielisku komentāru žurnāla “Māksla” 1990. gada 5. numurā sniedza mūzikas zinātniece Sofija Vēriņa, atceroties Pones pirmo viesošanos Latvijā 1971. gada vasarā: “Par galveno neizvirzīja atbraucēja mākslu, bet gan to, kādu politisku statusu viņam varētu piešķirt. Emigrants (11 gadu vecumā devies vecākiem līdzi trimdā). Avangardists (tas mums nepieņemami). Jā, ļoti progresīvs, humānists (bet nav marksists). Trockists! – beidzot rezumēja Latvijas komiteja kultūras sakariem ar tautiešiem ārzemēs. Tomēr komponistu uzņēma ļoti laipni, cenšoties viņa darbu vispārcilvēciskās idejas, cik iespējams, pielāgot oficiālajai [padomju] propagandai. Tā Gundaris Pone (tāpat kā viņa draugs un domubiedrs [ievērojamais itāļu komponists Luidži] Nono) nonāca paradoksālā stāvoklī – pie mums sava augstā humānistiskā potenciāla dēļ viņu uzskatīja par ideoloģiski “pareizu”, bet tehniski apmaldījušos; daļa tautiešu ārzemēs – par ideoloģiski apmaldījušos, bet tehniski “pareizu”.”

Jauku atsauksmi par savu kompozīcijas, teorijas un kontrapunkta skolotāju “Mūzikas Saulei” devis Pones audzēknis 1970. gadu sākumā, komponists Deivids Sosnovskis (David J. Sosnowski): “Viņš bija ļoti pacietīgs saskarsmē ar jaunieti, kuru interesēja tikai pastāvošo tradīciju laušana, nevis to izprašana. Vienmēr atcerēšos Pones laipnību un iecietību pret manu dumpinieciskumu. Viņa teiciens bija šāds: “Pirms tu lauz likumus, tev tie jāiepazīst.” Viņa iespaids uz mani bija fundamentāls, un tāds tas ir palicis līdz šai dienai. Tas ir interesanti, kā idejas un atmiņas dzīvo pāri laikam. Man šķiet, ka Pone būtu pasmaidījis par to – viņš uztvēra idejas kā dzīves būtnes, kuru sētās sēklas rada jaunas un negaidītas koncepcijas gadu desmitus un pat simtus pēc tam, kad pats ideju sējējs jau citā saulē.”

Gundaris Pone esot bijis švītīgs. Klīst runas par ekstravagancēm, piemēram, krokodilādas jostām u. tml. Vienlaikus – viegli atturīgs. Ar savu biogrāfiju nav uzmācies. Dzirdēts, ka franciskā strīpiņa uz burta e komponista uzvārdā esot pārprasta švītīguma piemērs. Ticamāk tomēr liekas, ka šis nelatviskais accent aigu lietots tādēļ, lai uzvārds tiktu izrunāts ar e, kas citādi pēc cittautu modes taptu noklusēts. 

Orests Silabriedis

Kritika

The first studio recordings of three of Gundaris Pone's large-scale orchestral works reveal a mid-20th century composer of great imagination writing European music yet with his roots in Latvia

Latvian-American composer Gundaris Pone wrote music that transcended his country of birth. Born in Riga, his family emigrated to America in 1950, fleeing the advancing Soviet troops, and it was here that Pone trained and lived. Latvian music up until the second half of the 20th century largely reflected a mood of national romanticism, so Pone’s music seemed to many like the avantgarde of its time, yet Pone himself believed that Latvia was the true place for his scores. 

Of his style, Pone would say in an interview that though he was labelled an avantgardist, he had never considered himself so, that he thought "music should be written for the broadest masses of people, including those who haven’t been specially educated in music."

This album from the Latvian Music Information Centre's SKANI label features world premiere studio recordings of works for large orchestra La SerenissimaAmerican Portraits and Avanti! All written between 1971 and 1984. The performers are the Liepāja Symphony Orchestra, conductors Guntis Kuzma and Normunds Šnē.

We begin with La Serenissima, seven Venetian portraits for orchestra, a work that won competitions in Trieste in 1981 and in Louisville in 1983 as well as the Witney prize. Venice held a special place in the composer's heart and in later life he divided his time between the city and the USA. The work's material revolves around five notes, A – E flat – E – D – B, evidently spelling out LA S(es)-E-RE-nisSIma. The language is richly evocative and lush, even though the style is definitely modernism. But I kept getting hints of Britten's intelligent use of 20th century modernism too, here is a composer viewing European music through distinctly individualistic glasses. The work is in seven parts, each with an Italian title though for convenience I refer to the English translations.

Part 1, The dialectic of morning shadows: in the streets and squares, is distinctly evocative, full of distinctive timbres and textures, richly complex harmonies. Part 2, Lyrical Venice: the Arch of Paradise remains complex yet transparent, contrasting wildly with the vivid trumpets at the opening of Part 3, Severe Venice: the mouth of the lion, which merges violence with vibrant dance. Part 4, The dialectic of afternoon waters, is delicate yet busy and quasi-nocturnal whilst Part 5, A meeting with the messenger of death on the island of San Michele moves into real night music, or perhaps nightmare music. Part 6, Evening chatter on San Bartolomeo Square is all vivid scurrying yet with something eerie about it too, what are these people chattering about. Finally, Part 7, The dialectic of night fog: spectral Venice, which has an underlying rhythmic structure with more slithering music over, again I had thoughts about Britten and his fondness for passcaglia structure, but also get surprising fragments of popular songs.

This is large scale, complex music yet such is the evocative, almost descriptive nature of Pone's writing that despite the complexity the music has great appeal. Full of timbres and textures, Pone uses his orchestra with great idiosyncratic skill. Why don't we know this music more? The performers on the disc gave the work's Latvian premiere in May 2023, so it is not surprising if others have not picked it up, yet.

We don't know that much about the origins of Pone's American Portraits. Written in 1983-84, the composer stated in a letter that the work was to be performed by the Baltimore Symphony Orchestra in the 1985-86 season, but the first known performance is by the Louisville Symphony Orchestra in 1986. Evidently Pone stated that he had portrayed five Americans: an inventor, a famous film star, a powerful financier, a gangster and a military genius. All legendary – some in a good way, others in a bad way. No more details!

The work is in five movements, each vividly characterised and perhaps slightly harder edged and less evocative than La Serenissima but still Pone's writing is vivid and eclectic. He isn't frightened of hard modernist sounds, yet can continue with a quote from Five Foot Two, Eyes of Blue composed by Ray Henderson, which Pone notes should to be performed in a 1920s style. It is this sheer eclecticism and vivid imagination that appeals.

The final work on the disc Avanti! is the earliest, dating from 1975. Avanti! was commissioned for the 1975 Latvian Song Festival in Toronto, but the event’s organising committee rejected the composition. Judging by contemporary articles, the organisers of the 1983 Song Festival in Milwaukee were of the same mind – Avanti! was not performed for political reasons, and also the piece turned out to be too difficult to be played with the musical resources available. Pone has a clear dialectic and perhaps didactic aim in the piece, he uses a motif from the Latvian 1905 revolutionary song With Battle Cries on Our Lips to an effect that we might see as political. Perhaps this is a good moment to remember that Pone, at various times, called himself a socialist, a Marxist, a communist.

The highly informative booklet quotes musicologist Sofija Vēriņa recalling, in 1990, Pone's first visit to Latvia in 1971 (at the height of the Soviet period), "The main issue was not the art of this visitor, but what political status he should be given. The emigrant (who at the age of eleven had fled into exile with his parents). The avantgardist (unacceptable to us). Yes, very progressive, so a humanist (but not a Marxist). A Trotskyist!, finally decided the Latvian Committee for Cultural Relations with Compatriots Abroad. However, the composer was received very kindly, with the authorities trying to adapt the universal humanist ideas in his work as best as possible to the official [Soviet] propaganda. Thus Gundaris Pone (like his friend and colleague [the eminent Italian composer Luigi] Nono) found himself in a paradoxical position: here, due to his high humanistic potential, he was considered ideologically ‘correct’ but technically misguided, whereas some compatriots abroad saw him as ideologically misguided but technically ‘correct’." The mention in Nono is intriguing, as here is another composer who combined complexity with a lack of dogma and a sense of vivid imagination.

Other elements in Avanti include, disturbingly, a cuckoo, and a quotation of Bach’s mournful chorale O Traurigkeit, o Herzeleid, of which Pone said, "That is all I can do within my philosophy. Because after all, we do not know what the final answer will be; we can only stand before the question mark."

The Liepāja Symphony Orchestra, conductors Guntis Kuzma (for La Serenissima and American Portraits) and Normunds Šnē (for Avanti!) do Pone proud. This is a vividly realised recording which does full justice to the complexity and vivid imagination of this music. 

Robert Hugill,
www.planethugill.com, 22/07/2024

Test alt tekst